What struck me is how well the quotation applies to recent events, especially those of the last few days. This is precisely the bizarre system of misrule I have elsewhere described as “anarcho-tyranny”-we refuse to control real criminals (that’s the anarchy) so we control the innocent (that’s the tyranny). The state frames people for the murder of others, so the real killers can prey upon the public.Unwilling to control immigration and the cultural disintegration it causes, the authorities instead control the law-abiding. This is the bloodiest manifestation of anarcho-tyranny. The real killer was allowed to walk free and kill many more people as a result of the FBI framing innocent men. Greg Scarpa killed close to 100 people while he was on the FBI payroll as an informant.Īs Howie Carr noted about the Deegan case, it was not just that four men were framed for a crime they did not commit. During the civil rights unrest, the FBI hired Mafia heavy Greg Scarpa, whose nickname was “The Grim Reaper,” to torture suspects in the case of missing civil rights protestors. This was not an isolated example of the FBI working hand in glove with organized crime on a caper. Also note that the Deegan case went all the way to the top. The FBI agents involved in this case and many others involving the Boston Mafia felt a closer bond to sadistic killers than to the people they had sworn an oath to defend. Why did the FBI frame these men? As the great Boston columnist Howie Carr noted after the truth was revealed, the FBI just liked being criminals more than they liked doing their job. Two of the framed men died in prison, while two were eventually released. The FBI framed Louis Greco, Henry Tameleo, Ronald Cassesso, and Peter Limone for the murder by having Mafia hitman Joe Barbosa, whose nickname was “The Animal,” testify against them at trial. Deegan was a local hood killed by local gangsters. In 1965 the FBI framed four men for the murder of Teddy Deegan in Chelsea, Mass. It is not always about politics with the FBI. It is not unreasonable to say that the FBI was an entrapment machine for the decade after 9/11. This made the political class happy, and it made the Bureau look good to a gullible public. Having ignored all of the warnings about the 9/11 plot, the FBI spent the following decade entrapping and framing people with names like Sami Osmakac as Islamic terrorists. The pattern over the past twenty years is obvious. The primary conspirator was an FBI informant, and his partners were FBI agents posing as explosives dealers. Further back, the FBI recruited members of an Occupy Wall Street camp in Cleveland into a plot to blow up a bridge. Here is a story about how the FBI talked a suicidal pizza delivery man into believing he was joining an Islamic terror group. This is not a recent phenomenon or even all that unusual. The idiots entrapped in this case went from being local losers to domestic terrorists, because setting up a group of idiots is easier than solving real crimes. This is a recent example of how the FBI brought down some “white nationalists.” In reality they created the entire plot and then talked some slack-jawed yokels into going along with it. It is not unreasonable to say that the main role of the FBI is to create entrapment schemes in order to snare the gullible and stupid. ![]() That is the anarchy half of anarcho-tyranny. Most likely you get a letter telling you it is at a tow yard. ![]() If they stumble upon your stolen car, they may tell you about it, but maybe not. You have to go to the station to file a report, but that is for insurance reasons. On the other hand, if your car is stolen or vandalized, the police cannot be bothered to look for the car or the people vandalizing it. You cannot drive anywhere without the prospect of being fined for some trivial violation of the law. These cameras primarily function as a revenue enhancement for state and local government. Drive around any city and you will notice the streets are festooned with cameras. The state harassed citizens over their ownership of firearms but did nothing to protect them from violent criminals.Ī modern example is something people experience every day. When Francis was alive, gun control was often used as an example. The term “anarcho-tyranny” was coined by the late great Sam Francis to mean a condition in which the state tyrannically regulates the lives of the citizens but refuses to enforce fundamental protective law.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |